Test-Scratch-Wiki talk:Block Plugin Bugs

"moderate"
We need to moderate it? Blob8108 13:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * We need a group of people to be in charge of deciding if discussions should be closed, people to archive, etc. We don't want random people closing discussions, do we really? Mathfreak231 Talk to me! I did that! 14:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it's fine — let's just release it into the main space. If people mess it up, we can always revert. IMHO you can always sort out moderation later, if it becomes a problem. :) Blob8108 10:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It'll be in the Scratch Wiki namespace because there will be discussion and signing. Mathfreak231 Talk to me! I did that! 00:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I volunteer to moderate. Curiouscrab 02:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If we really need moderators, can't we just have the admins do it? veggieman001 05:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yus indeedy. @Mathfreak Yes, yes, that's what I meant... Blob8108 08:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Plus, you can close them, of course, since you're the one actually making it. veggieman001 16:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Who: me or Blob? Or both? I still think I should get a hand in this, because I started up the page in the first place. Mathfreak231 Talk to me! I did that! 20:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Blob, since he's the one making it. I don't actually have much of an opinion on who should. Also, TBH, making the page doesn't inherently give you a say in the content/moderation. veggieman001 00:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sidestepping the issue of who "moderates" (I'd rather just use Github Issues anyway, tbh :P) — @MF, could you archive them immediately instead of closing them? It looks kinda cluttered. Thanks! Blob8108 08:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You could have asked that in a new section. It does seem to be bugging out... Okay. Mathfreak231 15:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Link
The Github link returns a 404 error. 3sal2 04:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * blob8108 → tjvr blob8108 13:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)