From Test-Scratch-Wiki
Test-Scratch-Wiki talk:Table of Contents/translate
Italicizing the more links
I'm not sure... would it look better like that? <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 05:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Nah, it's fine. <scratchsig>Veggieman001</scratchsig> 06:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Shortcut
There is a shortcut here, why isn't it listed on the page? Not even noinclude? <scratchsig>Mathfreak231</scratchsig> 22:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- What is it? Maybe it hasn't been added yet.<scratchsig>Curiouscrab</scratchsig> 00:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- S:TOC. I'm pretty sure it's because it would mess up the page layout. People do come visit this page too. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 18:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I looked it up and found it to be S:TOC. Just use the <noinclude> tags. If people do visit this page, then the purpose of the Shortcut template would be valid, although I don't entirely understand the purpose of the shortcut. Also, Sci your sig changed again and shocked me. I thought you were another user. Can't get enough Star of David?<scratchsig>Curiouscrab</scratchsig> 19:25, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- It's because if we used {{shortcut}}, it would mess up the page layout. Try it out in your sandbox.
- About my icon: Well, Israeli Independence Day is Tuesday, and Memorial Day is Monday, so now i have an Israeli flag. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 19:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- It didn't seem to mess up for me. Well, it did at first. But I put the TOC header and the shortcut in separate "<noinclude>" tags and made some blank lines in between the "</noinclude>" to the next "<noinclude>" and it got successful. See what I did here. <scratchsig>Legobob23o</scratchsig> 19:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, maybe. Except with the lines between the noincludes, then they show up on Main Page. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 12:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, we could just not use those lines in between the <noinclude>s. It wouldn't matter if the shortcuts went in the TOC header. Right? <scratchsig>Legobob23o</scratchsig> 23:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think it would look so good. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 13:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- I just figured out what we could do! I made a bunch more adjustments here and copied and pasted the text from the "Contents" section of the Main Page and and tried putting {{/Grandsand/Greatsand}} just after the ">" in my main sandbox (User:Legobob23o/Sandbox) and it then became successful! Do you think we could try the ideas and see how they go? <scratchsig>Legobob23o</scratchsig> 16:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think it would look so good. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 13:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, we could just not use those lines in between the <noinclude>s. It wouldn't matter if the shortcuts went in the TOC header. Right? <scratchsig>Legobob23o</scratchsig> 23:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, maybe. Except with the lines between the noincludes, then they show up on Main Page. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 12:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- It didn't seem to mess up for me. Well, it did at first. But I put the TOC header and the shortcut in separate "<noinclude>" tags and made some blank lines in between the "</noinclude>" to the next "<noinclude>" and it got successful. See what I did here. <scratchsig>Legobob23o</scratchsig> 19:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I looked it up and found it to be S:TOC. Just use the <noinclude> tags. If people do visit this page, then the purpose of the Shortcut template would be valid, although I don't entirely understand the purpose of the shortcut. Also, Sci your sig changed again and shocked me. I thought you were another user. Can't get enough Star of David?<scratchsig>Curiouscrab</scratchsig> 19:25, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- S:TOC. I'm pretty sure it's because it would mess up the page layout. People do come visit this page too. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 18:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Well, OK. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 19:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
move please
this does not belong in project namespace. sysop please move? <scratchsig>Krett12</scratchsig> 10:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- Where, why? <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 10:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- I pretty much entirely agree with Scimonster - what namespace does it belong in? Also, if we move namespaces, we're gonna have to move a lot of subpages. <scratchsig>derpmeup</scratchsig> 19:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe Help:Table of Contents. Also, the wiki will do that for you with the subpage thing :P <scratchsig>Krett12</scratchsig> 00:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- It didn't when -PRO- moved Curator to Curator (front page) ;) <scratchsig>derpmeup</scratchsig> 00:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- He didn't press the special button. <scratchsig>Krett12</scratchsig> 00:14, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oh. But, really, I don't want to have to fix possibly hundreds of links facing to this namespace still xD <scratchsig>derpmeup</scratchsig> 00:15, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- He didn't press the special button. <scratchsig>Krett12</scratchsig> 00:14, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- It didn't when -PRO- moved Curator to Curator (front page) ;) <scratchsig>derpmeup</scratchsig> 00:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe Help:Table of Contents. Also, the wiki will do that for you with the subpage thing :P <scratchsig>Krett12</scratchsig> 00:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- I pretty much entirely agree with Scimonster - what namespace does it belong in? Also, if we move namespaces, we're gonna have to move a lot of subpages. <scratchsig>derpmeup</scratchsig> 19:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
I actually haven't noticed that before! <scratchsig>derpmeup</scratchsig> 00:32, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- No support for the move. It's a table of contents for the Scratch Wiki, hence the namespace.<scratchsig>Mathfreak231</scratchsig> 00:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- That pretty much summarizes everything I was saying <scratchsig>derpmeup</scratchsig> 00:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- With that logic, every article should be in this namespace. <scratchsig>Krett12</scratchsig> 02:00, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- And by your logic, nothing belongs here. I think it should be left like this. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 08:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- With that logic, every article should be in this namespace. <scratchsig>Krett12</scratchsig> 02:00, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- That pretty much summarizes everything I was saying <scratchsig>derpmeup</scratchsig> 00:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Just A Point
Why edit protect? There's lots of stuff used on the main page that's not protected.<scratchsig>Krett12</scratchsig> 14:48, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- I guess it's commonly accessed.<scratchsig>Turkey3</scratchsig> 21:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- The page, news, featured images and article are all protected. Pretty much just the images aren't, right? <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 17:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)