From Test-Scratch-Wiki
Article Title
Should the title be "to-do" or "ToDo"? <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 18:59, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- I just discovered | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:To-do_list. I like todo as one word, (google 'todo', a lot of To-do list apps use todo too) but if you want we could go for To-do. <scratchsig>JSO</scratchsig> 19:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- I also think to-do would be better. <scratchsig>Lucario621</scratchsig> 21:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- To-do is the best title ever and whoever just said that it would be a good idea today to Lucario to remind him of this must be a genius or something. <scratchsig>Veggieman001</scratchsig> 21:54, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Better sortable list
If we're having it be sortable, then it'll be annoying to have to use numbers. So, here's a (Prototype) idea:
| Description | User(s) | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Create new to-do list to keep track of all stuff we still have to do. | JSO | 4Done
|
| Beautify and expand the ToC so it feels explorable. All plain pagelists should be avoided. | everyone | 3Busy |
| Complete and expand the List of Companies | everyone | 3Busy |
It uses invisible text to sort it. It looks a bit weird so we'd have to fix that. <scratchsig>BWOG</scratchsig> 19:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't add the numbers, I had it like yours. Scimonster replaced the words by numbers because alphabetic sorting isn't relevant on these statuses (which is true). I tweaked it again to display the words and sort by a hidden number. Is this ok? <scratchsig>JSO</scratchsig> 19:22, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- Even better. Didn't know you could do that. <scratchsig>BWOG</scratchsig> 19:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Add more info to infoboxes on block articles
Add "added" and "removed" parameters to {{Block}} on block articles. What do you guys think about this idea? Also, for blocks that haven't been removed yet, should we simply not include the parameter, or include with a value of "N/A"? And what about for Scratch 2.0 blocks that haven't been officially added yet? <scratchsig>Lucario621</scratchsig> 20:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- For existing blocks, i think we can just skip the removed. And for 2.0 blocks, we should qualify it with 2.0 (pre-)alpha/beta. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 18:32, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Somebody added this. When this page is updated next, can someone change that status to done?<scratchsig>Curiouscrab</scratchsig> 14:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Can I...
Categorize this under 'Main Pages'? <scratchsig>Wolvesstar97</scratchsig> 19:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I suppose so. :) Or maybe 'Community', if you think that would work better. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 13:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Outdated, no?
A lot of these tasks have been here for a year or two, I'm sure... <scratchsig>Mathfreak231</scratchsig> 20:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- I've made some modifications but feel free to make some of your own. <scratchsig>veggieman001</scratchsig> 20:45, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- Well it's not like I can look into the past on what's been happening... (well i could but i'm too lazy to wait for my somewhat unreliable mac to load every single archive :P) <scratchsig>Mathfreak231</scratchsig> 00:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ah well. I'd also kind of like to restructure this page to focus on different WikiProject-type things more, but I may wait a bit to do that (once I finish some other stuff). <scratchsig>veggieman001</scratchsig> 00:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Well it's not like I can look into the past on what's been happening... (well i could but i'm too lazy to wait for my somewhat unreliable mac to load every single archive :P) <scratchsig>Mathfreak231</scratchsig> 00:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Definitely Outdated- Here's Some Suggestions
This page has a potential to be very useful- but it's outdated.
I don't know many of these tasks, but here's what I've come up with:
- Update Curator page(s) every other Monday
- Update the SDS article whenever there's a new one
- Update the Video Update every month(ish)
Is there anything else that needs to be added/needs to stay? Suggestions are greatly welcomed! I'd like to see this updated often. <scratchsig>Purplebook163</scratchsig> 04:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Also, linking to redirects should be allowed if the name of the redirect is the wanted text of the link, as it would save lots of server space. User:Mitopolis/Signature 03:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- "Lots of server space is really a very big exaggeration". Compared to images it uses up hardly any space linking to shorter titles. <scratchsig>Hamish752</scratchsig> 05:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
